Termout.org logo/LING


Update: February 24, 2023 The new version of Termout.org is now online, so this web site is now obsolete and will soon be dismantled.

Lista de candidatos sometidos a examen:
1) reported speech (*)
(*) Términos presentes en el nuestro glosario de lingüística

1) Candidate: reported speech


Is in goldstandard

1
paper CO_Lenguajetxt7 - : The content of the message is called now a "locution" (direct or indirect), but it is not analyzed as a participant in the verbal process because it is found outside the verbal clause. When the message is expressed through reported speech, the logico-semantic relation between a primary and a secondary member of a clause nexus is called "projection" in functional grammar (Halliday, 2004: 376 ). This relationship between the two members is like the one "between a picture (projected clause) and its frame (projecting clause): together they make up a single complex unit, but neither is actually part of the other" (Thompson, 2004: 103).

2
paper MX_ElAnuariodeLetrastxt6 - : The Reported Speech Use in the PRESEEA Corpus of Seville: the High Sociolect

3
paper UY_ALFALtxt228 - : This article deals with two conceptually correlated phenomena, Reported Speech and Fictive Interaction (^[36]Pascual 2014), based on the theory of fictivity (^[37]Talmy 2000) about discrepant representations of the same object: discourse . It is postulated that RS and FI trigger the Conversation Frame to structure the discursive construction. The former is taken as factive or genuine and the latter as fictive or not genuine. In the search for empirical evidence in C-ORAL-BRASIL I (^[38]Raso e Mello 2012), informal spontaneous speech corpus of Brazilian Portuguese, it was verified that instances of Reported Speech represent factual problems, while of Fictive Interaction, pro-factual solutions, according to the discursive pattern "Problem-Solution" (^[39]Hoey 2001). In addition, it has been observed that such instances, even though they carry unique illocutionary acts, are grouped into attentional frames (^[40]Langacker 2008) that transcend the uniqueness of the informational components,

4
paper corpusSignostxt362 - : Abstract: This article analyzes the reported speech use in Santiago de Chile from a sociolinguistic point of view. For this purpose, we studied the discursive sequences in which they are used in 54 interviews that form part of the Sociolinguistic Corpus PRESEEA in Santiago, Chile. Studies on the polyphony of language (Ducrot, 1986; Reyes, 1993) and sociolinguistic analysis of discourse (Silva-Corvalán, 2001; Serrano, 2006) were consulted for the conceptual framework of this research. On the one hand, the analysis considers the reported speech as a sociolinguistic variable case, in a broad sense of the concept, with two values or general forms: direct speech and indirect speech, and with different subtypes or specific variations according to different levels or degrees of reformulation and detachment of the subjects from the utterance . Consequently, socio-demographic factors of subjects were correlated with the use of these variants, which were shown to have a relative impact on their

Evaluando al candidato reported speech:


1) sociolinguistic: 4 (*)
2) corpus: 3 (*)
3) clause: 3 (*)
4) discursive: 3
5) fictive: 3

reported speech
Lengua:
Frec: 59
Docs: 30
Nombre propio: 2 / 59 = 3%
Coocurrencias con glosario: 3
Puntaje: 3.737 = (3 + (1+4.08746284125034) / (1+5.90689059560852)));
Candidato aceptado

Referencias bibliográficas encontradas sobre cada término

(Que existan referencias dedicadas a un término es también indicio de terminologicidad.)
reported speech
: 13. Calsamiglia, H. y López Ferrero, C. (2003). Role and position of scientific voices: Reported speech in the media. Discourse Studies, 5 ( 2), 147-173.
: 15. Hickmann, Maya. 1993. The boundaries of reported speech in narrative discourse: some developmental aspects. En John Lucy (ed.), Reflexive language. Reported speech and metapragmatics, 63-90. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
: Calsamiglia, H. & López, C. (2003). Role and position of scientific voices: Reported speech in the media. Discourse Studies, 5(2), 147-173.
: Clift, R. (2006). Indexing stance: Reported speech as an interactional evidential. Journal of Sociolinguistics, 10(5), 569-95.
: Clift, R. (2007). Getting there first: non-narrative reported speech in interaction. En E. Holt & R. Clift (Eds.), Reporting Talk: Reported Speech in Interaction (pp. 120-149). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
: Estellés-Arguedas, M. (2015), “Expressing evidentiality through prosody? Prosodic voicing in reported speech in Spanish colloquial conversations”, Journal of Pragmatics, 85, pp. 138-154.
: Grinswold, Olga. 2016. Center stage: Direct and indirect reported speech in conversational storytelling, Issues in Applied Linguistics, 20: 73-90. (en línea) Disponible en [152]https://escholarship.org/content/qt19b8197x/qt19b8197x.pdf
: Günthner, Susanne. 1999. Polyphony and the `layering of voices´ in reported dialogues: an analysis of the use of prosodic devices in everyday reported speech, Journal of Pragmatics, 31, 5: 685-708.
: Krestel, R. (2007) Automatic analysis and reasoning on reported speech in newspaper articles. Tesis de Magister Universität Karlsruhe. Karlsruhe. Alemania. Disponible en [58]http://www.semanticsoftware.info/system/files/believer.pdf.
: Kvavik, K. H. (1986), “Characteristics of direct and reported speech prosody: Evidence from Spanish”, en F. Coulmas (ed.), Direct and Indirect Speech, La Haya, Mouton de Gruyter, pp. 333-360.
: Larson, M. L. (1977). The function of reported speech in discourse. Tesis doctoral, University of Texas at Arlington, Arlington, Estados Unidos.
: Lucy, J. (1993). Reflexive language: Reported speech and metapragmatics. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
: Romaine, S. y D. Lange (1991), “The use of like as a marker of reported speech and thought: A case of grammaticalization in progress”, American Speech, 66:3, pp. 227-279.
: Serratrice, Ludovica, Anne Hesketh y Rachel Ashworth 2015. The use of reported speech in children’s narratives: A priming study. First Language, 35: 68-87. (en línea) Disponible en [178]https://doi.org/10.1177/0142723715569552
: Silverstein, M. (1993). Metapragmatic discourse and metapragmatic function. En J. Lucy (Ed.), Reflexive Language: Reported Speech and metapragmatic (pp. 33-58). Cambridge, UK: University Press.
: Smirnova, A. (2009). Reported speech as an element of argumentative newspaper discourse. Discourse Communication 3(1), 79-103.
: Vincent, D. & Perrin, L. (1999). On the narrative vs non-narrative functions of reported speech: A socio-pragmatic study. Journal of Sociolinguistics, 3(3), 291-313.
: Vitaljevna, A. (2009). Reported speech as an element of argumentive newspaper discourse. Discourse & Communication, 3(1), 79-103.
: Wilkinson, L., & Janks, H. (1998). Teaching Direct and Reported Speech from a Critical Language Awareness (CLA) Perspective. Educational Review, 50(2): 181-190.